roach133_ ALEXEI DRUZHININSputnikAFP via Getty Images_putn xi

Politics

中国的联俄抗美

Feb 10, 2022 Stephen S. Roach

纽黑文—历史的转折点很少清晰可辨。但2月4日，俄罗斯总统普京和中国国家主席习近平在北京冬奥会开幕之际发表的联合声明可能是个例外——它标志着新冷战的新转折点。

三足鼎立是美国在第一次冷战中的决定性战略策略。 50 年前的这个月，理查德尼克松与中国和解，在前苏联经济基础开始崩溃的时候孤立了它。正如亨利·基辛格（Henry Kissinger）在他的著作《论中国》（On China）中所说，“中美和解一开始是冷战的一个战术方面；它逐渐演变为新全球秩序演变的核心。”该战略经历多时才能成功。但是，17 年后，柏林墙倒塌，苏联解体。

中国绝不会忽视历史的教训，它在刚刚萌芽的第二次冷战中选择了三足鼎立战略。在美国特别脆弱的时候，中俄联手可以改变全球力量平衡。这表明了一个令人担忧的结局。

To continue reading, register now.

Subscribe now for unlimited access to everything PS has to offer.

As a registered user, you can enjoy more PS content every month – for free.

Already have an account? Log in

Holiday Sale: Save $50 on all new PS subscriptions

Subscribe now to gain greater access to Project Syndicate – including every commentary and our entire On Point suite of subscriber-exclusive content – starting at just $34.99.

Subscribe Now

new comment has been posted. new comments have been posted.

0 Comments on this paragraph, 8 Comments on this article

Henry Rech Feb 17, 2022

What is the source of China's strategic power? Its economic power.

What is the source of its economic power? The fact that it turned to capitalism 40 years ago and has been able to exploit western capital, western technology, western education and western markets.

Given that the US and to some extent the West generally is now denying, to a degree, China's access to these four factors so China's economic and strategic power will wane.

As China internalizes its economy, its internal cost structure will rise and make it less competitive in world markets, contributing to weakening its external economic power.

Its burgeoning internal economic power will however allow it to continue to build its military power.

So China's strategic power will be constrained by its waning external economic power and enhanced by its developing military power.

The source of Russia's strategic power is its military power. Its economic power is of little consequence. (Although its control of gas supplies to Europe is of consequence.)

The power of the Chinese Russian alliance is only of consequence if Russia is willing to exercise its military power.

The question is, is Russia actually willing to exercise its military power? For instance, is Russia actually willing to invade the Ukraine? It would not be too difficult to believe that Russia is not actually willing to invade but is only intent on playing a strong game of strategic poker.

The Russian deployment of substantial forces on the Ukrainian border has to some degree catalyzed a largely unified response in Europe but has also exposed fracture lines. Germany relies on Russian gas and is the strategic weak link.

The military and economic power of the US is without question (despite Roach's allusions to problems).

The central concern is the US's political stability. Its polity is highly polarized and troubled with the political class focused on the upcoming congressional elections.

If the triangulation of the US succeeds it will not be because of the Russian-Chinese alliance or US economic weakness but because the US is riven by an internal political maelstrom.
- Henry Rech Feb 19, 2022
  
  Kaysoon Lim
  
  Much of what you say is correct, but so what?
  
  Chinese hubris will lead it into strategic blunders and threaten world peace.
  
  Your intimations that the US economy is troubled are exaggerated. The US is the world's most powerful economy. That doesn't mean it is the largest or that it has to be the largest.
  
  The only thing holding the US back is internal political turmoil.
  
  But that might just be stilled in the face of an existential external strategic threat.
  A new reply to this comment has been posted.
- KaySoon Lim Feb 19, 2022
  
  Western Capital is a mirage of printed USD, which the printed machine is already over-heating, triggering inflation. Western technology is struggling even with 5G, glided hypersonic...etc. Western education is no longer the only premier education. As for Western market, despite tariffs, sanctions and bans on China, US continue to grow her trade deficits with China. US Treasury Secretary warns that any increase of tariffs on China will only exacerbates US inflation only. Economic power is the tip of the ice-berg, the mass is in China's mass education, hunger for knowledge, and the determination to climb to the top of development in important fields, resulting in China as the world factory. China BRI is to expand economic growth in all directions instead of counting on the West alone, while internal consumption growth is to strengthen her economic base. As for Russia-China economic cooperation, they have very good synergy as pointed out by Stephen Roach.
  
  As for military, even Biden himself admitted, US has to avoid a face-to-face military confrontation with Russia (over Ukraine) when nuclear holocaust can be a likely outcome between the two nuclear power nations. Trump's administration of planning a tactical nuclear war with China has woken her up to the need of increasing her nuclear arsenal to match US, to ensure M.A.D. With China's production costs, production of her conventional weaponry (sea, land, air and space) can catch up with the US in the near future.
  A new reply to this comment has been posted.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
George Stockus Feb 17, 2022

Corporate America's titans are living off China. From Apple to Starbucks to JPM and Blackrock. Call it commercial kompromat. Either via cost arbitrage of supply chain or in chasing end market growth, how much of the S&P500 is vested in China's form of communism, human rights commitments and territorial ambitions - a concept unthinkable decades ago. How is it America can exercise any wits on the geopolitical chessboard with such a compromised economic reality?
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Chris Cullen Feb 14, 2022

It’s worrisome to see the article painting such a dismal picture of the future. It seemed from the article, if the two countries decide to cooperate, it could only be a bad thing for the world. This narrow-minded zero sum mentality is poisonous to what the world really needs, cooperation, and obstructs people from thinking beyond one’s own lifespan. Putting interest higher than one’s responsibility to the society and the world may only contribute to the dismantlement of world peace. Living in a world with so many countries, sometimes, taking a step back and let others’ breathe for a while could be an advance for the human race and lead to a more harmonious future.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
KaySoon Lim Feb 13, 2022

US tends to look at the world with her own prism, diffused with colours, instead at what it is. To make matters worse, she thinks the world also see it with the same prism of Machiavellism, with zero-sum game of international relations. China has gone through her era two thousands years ago of triangulation in the classic 'Romance of the Three Kingdoms'. I can assure you, China has learned that if it is anything, it is definitely not romantic, as over the two hundred years, endless confrontations and degradations on all sides. At the end, none of the Kingdom emerge as the top "dog", instead someone other power took over. Mutual respects and mutual benefits with win-win mentality will give mankind a better chance and better lives.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.

https://prosyn.org/ffETAWIzh

中国的联俄抗美

Holiday Sale: Save $50 on all new PS subscriptions

New Comment

Contact us

Log in/Register

中国的联俄抗美

Holiday Sale: Save $50 on all new PS subscriptions

Edit Newsletter Preferences

Set up Notification