Above-target US inflation and a strong labor market reflect robust economic fundamentals. But the biggest risks to the US economy’s continued growth are Donald Trump’s erratic communication and, perhaps more importantly, his populist trade and immigration policies.
WASHINGTON, DC – As investors, business leaders, and policymakers consider America’s economic outlook, two things should be front of mind. First, the US economy is very strong. And, second, President Donald Trump’s populist policies pose one of the biggest risks to its continued growth.
In January, core consumer-price-index (CPI) inflation (excluding food and energy prices) rose by 0.4% month on month – more than economists had expected, and double December’s increase, pushing the year-on-year rate to 3.3%.
Financial markets took note. But it has been clear for months that the Federal Reserve is not succeeding in pushing inflation toward its 2% target. Underlying inflation has been stuck since the spring of 2024. Using the personal consumption expenditures price index (excluding food and energy prices), year-on-year inflation was either 2.7% or 2.8% in seven of the last eight months. (It was 2.6% in June.) And 12-month core CPI inflation has been either 3.2% or 3.3% in each of the last eight months.
Meanwhile, the labor market is holding steady. The headline monthly unemployment rate has remained between 4% and 4.2% since May, and has been falling for the past two months. In fact, the labor market may be tightening. A broader measure that accounts for involuntary part-time schedules and marginal labor-force attachment implies that slack in the labor market may have been falling since July.
An inflation rate stuck above the Fed’s target and a strong labor market reflect robust economic fundamentals. Monthly employment gains have been strong and layoffs remain low, supporting household incomes and the consumer spending that has fueled the economy’s expansion. Economic output grew above its underlying potential in the second half of 2024. At the time of writing, the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta estimates that the economy is on track to grow 2.3% in the current quarter, arguably above its sustainable rate.
The risk of inflation reaccelerating is greater than the risk of labor-market deterioration. As I write, market prices imply a 16% chance that the Fed will not cut rates again in 2025. While investor expectations have been moving in the right direction in recent months, the odds of a rate hike – which in my view is likely this year – are still being downplayed.
At a time of escalating global turmoil, there is an urgent need for incisive, informed analysis of the issues and questions driving the news – just what PS has always provided.
Subscribe to Digital or Digital Plus now to secure your discount.
Subscribe Now
What could slow the economy? Trump’s erratic policy communication and, perhaps more importantly, his populist trade and immigration policies.
To be clear, much of what Trump hopes to achieve will strengthen the US economy. As I wrote recently, the president’s approach to artificial-intelligence regulation and antitrust enforcement, and his desire to expand domestic energy production, reduce corporate taxes, and roll back harmful regulations will boost growth. Investors largely agree – the S&P 500 has increased by around 6% since Trump’s victory in November.
But Trump has also sowed confusion about the future path of US economic policy, particularly concerning trade. US mergers and acquisitions were down nearly 30% in January 2025 compared to January 2024, reflecting this unpredictability. Consumers, too, are starting to show signs of nervousness. The University of Michigan’s index of consumer sentiment fell by 5% in February.
To be sure, since the pandemic, consumers have been as down on the economy as they typically are during recessions. But February’s decline in consumer sentiment seems to be related to inflation concerns. The Michigan survey showed a large month-on-month jump in median 12-month inflation expectations, from 3.3% to 4.3%. Notably, consumers in the Michigan survey were particularly gloomy about buying conditions for durable goods, which suggests anxiety about tariffs.
Research by economists Olivier Coibion, Yuriy Gorodnichenko, and Michael Weber shows that Americans expect to pay nearly half of the costs of any tariffs that Trump enacts. And a different survey found that two-thirds of Americans do not think Trump is doing enough to lower consumer prices. Tariff fears and the potential for higher prices could lead consumers to cut back their spending, slowing the current expansion.
While the uncertainty caused by Trump’s erratic policy communication is harmful, following through on his populist policies would be much more damaging. Trump’s first-term trade war increased consumer prices and reduced business investment, manufacturing employment, and competitiveness – without meaningfully cutting economic ties with China or lowering the trade deficit.
Goldman Sachs estimates that a sustained 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico – which Trump announced on February 1 but then almost immediately paused for 30 days – would reduce economic output by 0.4%. A study published by the Peterson Institute for International Economics finds that GDP will fall by 1.2% by 2028 if Trump deports 1.3 million illegal immigrants.
Trump was elected largely because voters rejected Joe Biden’s approach to economic policy, which had inflationary consequences. Given the US economy’s underlying strength, Trump has begun his second term with the wind at his back. He should build on this advantage by pursuing his many policy goals that would boost growth, rather than those that would impede it.
To have unlimited access to our content including in-depth commentaries, book reviews, exclusive interviews, PS OnPoint and PS The Big Picture, please subscribe
The Russian and (now) American vision of "peace" in Ukraine would be no peace at all. The immediate task for Europe is not only to navigate Donald’s Trump unilateral pursuit of a settlement, but also to ensure that any deal does not increase the likelihood of an even wider war.
sees a Korea-style armistice with security guarantees as the only viable option in Ukraine.
Rather than engage in lengthy discussions to pry concessions from Russia, US President Donald Trump seems committed to giving the Kremlin whatever it wants to end the Ukraine war. But rewarding the aggressor and punishing the victim would amount to setting the stage for the next war.
warns that by punishing the victim, the US is setting up Europe for another war.
Within his first month back in the White House, Donald Trump has upended US foreign policy and launched an all-out assault on the country’s constitutional order. With US institutions bowing or buckling as the administration takes executive power to unprecedented extremes, the establishment of an authoritarian regime cannot be ruled out.
The rapid advance of AI might create the illusion that we have created a form of algorithmic intelligence capable of understanding us as deeply as we understand one another. But these systems will always lack the essential qualities of human intelligence.
explains why even cutting-edge innovations are not immune to the world’s inherent unpredictability.
WASHINGTON, DC – As investors, business leaders, and policymakers consider America’s economic outlook, two things should be front of mind. First, the US economy is very strong. And, second, President Donald Trump’s populist policies pose one of the biggest risks to its continued growth.
In January, core consumer-price-index (CPI) inflation (excluding food and energy prices) rose by 0.4% month on month – more than economists had expected, and double December’s increase, pushing the year-on-year rate to 3.3%.
Financial markets took note. But it has been clear for months that the Federal Reserve is not succeeding in pushing inflation toward its 2% target. Underlying inflation has been stuck since the spring of 2024. Using the personal consumption expenditures price index (excluding food and energy prices), year-on-year inflation was either 2.7% or 2.8% in seven of the last eight months. (It was 2.6% in June.) And 12-month core CPI inflation has been either 3.2% or 3.3% in each of the last eight months.
Meanwhile, the labor market is holding steady. The headline monthly unemployment rate has remained between 4% and 4.2% since May, and has been falling for the past two months. In fact, the labor market may be tightening. A broader measure that accounts for involuntary part-time schedules and marginal labor-force attachment implies that slack in the labor market may have been falling since July.
An inflation rate stuck above the Fed’s target and a strong labor market reflect robust economic fundamentals. Monthly employment gains have been strong and layoffs remain low, supporting household incomes and the consumer spending that has fueled the economy’s expansion. Economic output grew above its underlying potential in the second half of 2024. At the time of writing, the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta estimates that the economy is on track to grow 2.3% in the current quarter, arguably above its sustainable rate.
The risk of inflation reaccelerating is greater than the risk of labor-market deterioration. As I write, market prices imply a 16% chance that the Fed will not cut rates again in 2025. While investor expectations have been moving in the right direction in recent months, the odds of a rate hike – which in my view is likely this year – are still being downplayed.
Winter Sale: Save 40% on a new PS subscription
At a time of escalating global turmoil, there is an urgent need for incisive, informed analysis of the issues and questions driving the news – just what PS has always provided.
Subscribe to Digital or Digital Plus now to secure your discount.
Subscribe Now
What could slow the economy? Trump’s erratic policy communication and, perhaps more importantly, his populist trade and immigration policies.
To be clear, much of what Trump hopes to achieve will strengthen the US economy. As I wrote recently, the president’s approach to artificial-intelligence regulation and antitrust enforcement, and his desire to expand domestic energy production, reduce corporate taxes, and roll back harmful regulations will boost growth. Investors largely agree – the S&P 500 has increased by around 6% since Trump’s victory in November.
But Trump has also sowed confusion about the future path of US economic policy, particularly concerning trade. US mergers and acquisitions were down nearly 30% in January 2025 compared to January 2024, reflecting this unpredictability. Consumers, too, are starting to show signs of nervousness. The University of Michigan’s index of consumer sentiment fell by 5% in February.
To be sure, since the pandemic, consumers have been as down on the economy as they typically are during recessions. But February’s decline in consumer sentiment seems to be related to inflation concerns. The Michigan survey showed a large month-on-month jump in median 12-month inflation expectations, from 3.3% to 4.3%. Notably, consumers in the Michigan survey were particularly gloomy about buying conditions for durable goods, which suggests anxiety about tariffs.
Research by economists Olivier Coibion, Yuriy Gorodnichenko, and Michael Weber shows that Americans expect to pay nearly half of the costs of any tariffs that Trump enacts. And a different survey found that two-thirds of Americans do not think Trump is doing enough to lower consumer prices. Tariff fears and the potential for higher prices could lead consumers to cut back their spending, slowing the current expansion.
While the uncertainty caused by Trump’s erratic policy communication is harmful, following through on his populist policies would be much more damaging. Trump’s first-term trade war increased consumer prices and reduced business investment, manufacturing employment, and competitiveness – without meaningfully cutting economic ties with China or lowering the trade deficit.
Goldman Sachs estimates that a sustained 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico – which Trump announced on February 1 but then almost immediately paused for 30 days – would reduce economic output by 0.4%. A study published by the Peterson Institute for International Economics finds that GDP will fall by 1.2% by 2028 if Trump deports 1.3 million illegal immigrants.
Trump was elected largely because voters rejected Joe Biden’s approach to economic policy, which had inflationary consequences. Given the US economy’s underlying strength, Trump has begun his second term with the wind at his back. He should build on this advantage by pursuing his many policy goals that would boost growth, rather than those that would impede it.