The fires burning today in Los Angeles and elsewhere are qualitatively different from those of the past: they are more intense, more frequent, more destructive, and far more difficult to extinguish, even when water is available. And there is only one culprit.
STANFORD – Los Angeles has been burning for almost two weeks now, and the blame game is in full swing. From diversity, equity, and inclusion policies and artificial-intelligence data centers to the mismanagement of public resources by political leaders, fingers seem to be pointed in every direction. But the charges being thrown around miss the point: the underlying cause of the conflagration is greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions generated by the burning of fossil fuels.
Even as President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for energy secretary, Chris Wright, disputes the scientifically established relationship between climate change and more severe wildfires, the fires rage on, destroying ecosystems and reducing neighborhoods to ashes across Los Angeles County – where about one-third of residents live within a mile of one of the area’s 8,335 active oil wells. This current disaster is exceptional only in that it affects a major US city. Similar fires are happening all over the world, and have been for a while – especially since 2016.
Consider the wildfires that engulfed Fort McMurray in Alberta – where pipelines carried more than 300,000 barrels of oil per day – in May of that year. The combination of wind, high temperatures, and plentiful dry brush quickly transformed a few burning embers into a raging inferno. With flying embers igniting numerous new fires, it did not take long for local firefighting capacity to become severely strained, leaving emergency services waiting for outside help to arrive.
Though there was no shortage of water – Fort McMurray is located at the convergence of four rivers – extinguishing the fires proved impossible, given the incredible speed of their spread in the parched air. Two days after the embers were first spotted in the brush, the entire city had to be abandoned, in what would become Alberta’s largest-ever wildfire evacuation. Ultimately, the fire destroyed Fort McMurray and its surrounding towns, becoming the most expensive disaster in Canada’s history.
Sound familiar? The oil wells of Los Angeles may be tucked behind Macy’s or Bloomingdale’s, or obscured by walls – out of sight, out of mind – but like any other oil well, they emit carbon dioxide and methane. The rapid and exponential increase in emissions of these GHGs, whether originating in Los Angeles or Lagos, is one of the main causes of observed climate change since the mid-twentieth century.
Fires happened before. The Santa Ana winds have long blown, and Los Angeles County has burned plenty of times. Moreover, it is difficult to establish GHG emissions as a proximate cause of a particular fire. But the blazes we are seeing today are qualitatively different from those of the past: they are more intense, more frequent, more destructive, and far more difficult to extinguish, even when water is available. These fires can only be called supercharged.
Secure your copy of PS Quarterly: The Year Ahead 2025
Our annual flagship magazine, PS Quarterly: The Year Ahead 2025, has arrived. To gain digital access to all of the magazine’s content, and receive your print copy, subscribe to PS Digital Plus now.
Subscribe Now
California has experienced many of these supercharged infernos in recent years: the Thomas Fire and the Santa Rosa Tubbs Fire in 2017, the Redding Carr Fire and the Camp Fire in 2018, the Bay Area Fire (which spread to Oregon and Washington) in 2020, and the Dixie Fire in 2021. “Fire weather” has also come to Arizona, Hawaii, New Mexico, and Texas, as well as Brazil, Greece, Portugal, Turkey, and other countries. Last year, 37.42 million acres of the Amazon, so necessary for absorbing GHGs, burned. What used to be a fire season is now a fire age.
Is it insensitive to discuss climate change during this moment of crisis? Shouldn’t we be focusing on people’s immediate needs, on the traumatic experiences so many are enduring, and on the exhaustion of brave first responders? Some say yes. But it is not too soon to apply the lessons of these supercharged fires. Unless we do, such catastrophes – and the needs, trauma, and exhaustion they bring – will proliferate and intensify.
The Los Angeles fires, and other recent blazes, should serve as a wake-up call to everyone, but especially to the United States – the world’s largest producer and consumer of oil and natural gas, and historically the highest emitter of GHGs. The US Department of Defense is the world’s largest institutional oil consumer, owing to America’s involvement in wars around the globe.
To be sure, fighting to eliminate GHG emissions amounts to provoking Goliath – a giant who profits enormously when we burn the fuels that are causing our homes to be gutted by fire. Fortunately, there are many Davids, like the 6,000 U’wa, an indigenous people who have tirelessly resisted oil development in Colombia’s cloud forests since 1991, when the government granted exploration rights to multinational companies. It took three decades and an international network of supporters, but last month, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ruled that Colombia had violated the rights of the U’wa by authorizing oil, gas, and mining projects on their land. Oil development in the area has been halted (at least for now), and an important precedent has been set.
The U’wa believe that oil is the “blood of the mother Earth.” As U’wa spokesperson Berito Kuwaru’wa warned, “If you take away her blood, our mother will experience vacillating heat and cold, ferocious winds and terrible fires, destruction like you have never seen.” Eliminating fossil fuels will not be easy, but it is far preferable to watching a prophecy come true.
To have unlimited access to our content including in-depth commentaries, book reviews, exclusive interviews, PS OnPoint and PS The Big Picture, please subscribe
For decades, an efficiency-centered “economic style” has dominated public policy, overriding the concerns for fairness that animated the New Deal and Lyndon B. Johnson’s Great Society. Now, Americans must brace for economic governance that delivers neither efficiency nor fairness, only chaos.
highlights the high cost of the single-minded focus on efficiency that has come to dominate the discipline.
While some observers doubt that US President-elect Donald Trump poses a grave threat to US democracy, others are bracing themselves for the destruction of the country’s constitutional order. With Trump’s inauguration just around the corner, we asked PS commentators how vulnerable US institutions really are.
STANFORD – Los Angeles has been burning for almost two weeks now, and the blame game is in full swing. From diversity, equity, and inclusion policies and artificial-intelligence data centers to the mismanagement of public resources by political leaders, fingers seem to be pointed in every direction. But the charges being thrown around miss the point: the underlying cause of the conflagration is greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions generated by the burning of fossil fuels.
Even as President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for energy secretary, Chris Wright, disputes the scientifically established relationship between climate change and more severe wildfires, the fires rage on, destroying ecosystems and reducing neighborhoods to ashes across Los Angeles County – where about one-third of residents live within a mile of one of the area’s 8,335 active oil wells. This current disaster is exceptional only in that it affects a major US city. Similar fires are happening all over the world, and have been for a while – especially since 2016.
Consider the wildfires that engulfed Fort McMurray in Alberta – where pipelines carried more than 300,000 barrels of oil per day – in May of that year. The combination of wind, high temperatures, and plentiful dry brush quickly transformed a few burning embers into a raging inferno. With flying embers igniting numerous new fires, it did not take long for local firefighting capacity to become severely strained, leaving emergency services waiting for outside help to arrive.
Though there was no shortage of water – Fort McMurray is located at the convergence of four rivers – extinguishing the fires proved impossible, given the incredible speed of their spread in the parched air. Two days after the embers were first spotted in the brush, the entire city had to be abandoned, in what would become Alberta’s largest-ever wildfire evacuation. Ultimately, the fire destroyed Fort McMurray and its surrounding towns, becoming the most expensive disaster in Canada’s history.
Sound familiar? The oil wells of Los Angeles may be tucked behind Macy’s or Bloomingdale’s, or obscured by walls – out of sight, out of mind – but like any other oil well, they emit carbon dioxide and methane. The rapid and exponential increase in emissions of these GHGs, whether originating in Los Angeles or Lagos, is one of the main causes of observed climate change since the mid-twentieth century.
Fires happened before. The Santa Ana winds have long blown, and Los Angeles County has burned plenty of times. Moreover, it is difficult to establish GHG emissions as a proximate cause of a particular fire. But the blazes we are seeing today are qualitatively different from those of the past: they are more intense, more frequent, more destructive, and far more difficult to extinguish, even when water is available. These fires can only be called supercharged.
Secure your copy of PS Quarterly: The Year Ahead 2025
Our annual flagship magazine, PS Quarterly: The Year Ahead 2025, has arrived. To gain digital access to all of the magazine’s content, and receive your print copy, subscribe to PS Digital Plus now.
Subscribe Now
California has experienced many of these supercharged infernos in recent years: the Thomas Fire and the Santa Rosa Tubbs Fire in 2017, the Redding Carr Fire and the Camp Fire in 2018, the Bay Area Fire (which spread to Oregon and Washington) in 2020, and the Dixie Fire in 2021. “Fire weather” has also come to Arizona, Hawaii, New Mexico, and Texas, as well as Brazil, Greece, Portugal, Turkey, and other countries. Last year, 37.42 million acres of the Amazon, so necessary for absorbing GHGs, burned. What used to be a fire season is now a fire age.
Is it insensitive to discuss climate change during this moment of crisis? Shouldn’t we be focusing on people’s immediate needs, on the traumatic experiences so many are enduring, and on the exhaustion of brave first responders? Some say yes. But it is not too soon to apply the lessons of these supercharged fires. Unless we do, such catastrophes – and the needs, trauma, and exhaustion they bring – will proliferate and intensify.
The Los Angeles fires, and other recent blazes, should serve as a wake-up call to everyone, but especially to the United States – the world’s largest producer and consumer of oil and natural gas, and historically the highest emitter of GHGs. The US Department of Defense is the world’s largest institutional oil consumer, owing to America’s involvement in wars around the globe.
To be sure, fighting to eliminate GHG emissions amounts to provoking Goliath – a giant who profits enormously when we burn the fuels that are causing our homes to be gutted by fire. Fortunately, there are many Davids, like the 6,000 U’wa, an indigenous people who have tirelessly resisted oil development in Colombia’s cloud forests since 1991, when the government granted exploration rights to multinational companies. It took three decades and an international network of supporters, but last month, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ruled that Colombia had violated the rights of the U’wa by authorizing oil, gas, and mining projects on their land. Oil development in the area has been halted (at least for now), and an important precedent has been set.
The U’wa believe that oil is the “blood of the mother Earth.” As U’wa spokesperson Berito Kuwaru’wa warned, “If you take away her blood, our mother will experience vacillating heat and cold, ferocious winds and terrible fires, destruction like you have never seen.” Eliminating fossil fuels will not be easy, but it is far preferable to watching a prophecy come true.