Ukraine’s immense industrial and human resources once helped make the Soviet Union a global power, and Russian President Vladimir Putin is counting on them to achieve his neo-imperialist dream. With the US now behaving like a Kremlin proxy, supporting Ukraine has become an existential imperative for Europe.
BERKELEY – Until the Oval Office meeting between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky went off the rails, it appeared that Zelensky was there to sign a deal requiring Ukraine to contribute 50% of future profits from its commodity mining to a fund jointly managed by the United States. Instead, Zelensky’s repeated requests for at least some security guarantees culminated in a verbal assault from Trump and US Vice President J.D. Vance, and Zelensky left empty-handed.
What Ukraine was supposed to gain from the deal was never entirely clear. But whatever the details, Ukraine’s value cannot be reduced to a mineral transaction. The country’s fate could reshape the geopolitical order, potentially shifting the balance of power, in Europe and beyond, for decades to come.
Despite Trump and Vance’s narrow characterization, Ukraine is far more than a small, mineral-rich country fighting off a much larger aggressor. Ukraine was a pillar of Soviet military power during World War II and the Cold War, and it remains a major source of agricultural commodities, skilled labor, and technological innovation.
Russian President Vladimir Putin understands Ukraine’s strategic value, seeing it as critical to his neo-imperialist project. Before and after World War II, Ukraine was a key hub of the Soviet Union’s military-industrial complex, manufacturing aircraft, ships, and tanks, along with the aluminum and steel needed to build them. The iconic T-34 tank, a mainstay of the Soviet army during World War II, was produced in Kharkiv, while Mykolaiv’s shipyards manufactured the Soviet navy’s most formidable cruisers and submarines.
Ukraine contributed enormously to the war effort. Seven million Ukrainian soldiers – more than one-fifth of the Red Army – fought against Nazi Germany. Many were senior officers, including Marshal Semyon Timoshenko, a key architect of the Soviet victory.
Ukraine’s strategic importance grew during the Cold War. Ukrainian physicists were at the forefront of nuclear science, conducting the Soviet Union’s first successful nuclear-fission experiments, designing viable nuclear explosives, and laying the foundation for the Soviet nuclear-weapons program.
At a time of escalating global turmoil, there is an urgent need for incisive, informed analysis of the issues and questions driving the news – just what PS has always provided.
Subscribe to Digital or Digital Plus now to secure your discount.
Subscribe Now
Beyond research, Ukraine was a major producer of nuclear missiles. It produced some of the Soviet Union’s most powerful intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), including the R-36, dubbed “SS-18 Satan” by NATO. Ukraine remained integral to Russia’s nuclear arsenal well into the 2010s, having manufactured 15% of its heavy silo-based ICBMs.
Moreover, the Soviet Union’s first ICBMs were designed by a Ukrainian engineer, Sergei Korolev, while he was a political prisoner. After his release, he became the USSR’s chief rocket designer, leading the team that launched Sputnik 1, the world’s first satellite, and sent the first probes to the Moon and the first human into space.
Despite Russia’s claim to be the Soviet Union’s sole heir, Ukraine inherited a significant share of the USSR’s military capabilities. When it declared independence in 1991, it had 1.5 million troops and a sizable naval fleet. It also had the world’s third-largest nuclear arsenal, but under international pressure, Ukraine agreed to relinquish its warheads to Russia in exchange for security guarantees from the US, the United Kingdom, and – ironically – Russia itself. Ukraine also agreed to divide the Black Sea Fleet, transferring or selling most of its ships to Russia.
Even after voluntarily giving up much of its military power, Ukraine remains strategically vital, owing to its vast agricultural, natural, and industrial resources. Moreover, its resistance to Russian tyranny has forged the most skilled and battle-tested military force in Europe.
But Russia is determined to undermine Ukraine’s strength by draining its resources, forcibly conscripting tens of thousands of men – particularly ethnic minorities – from the territories it occupies. More than 43,000 people from Crimea and 48,000 from eastern Ukraine have been sent to fight for Russia. Meanwhile, Ukraine’s natural wealth is being plundered, with Russia seizing control of rare-earth deposits concentrated in the regions under its occupation.
If Ukraine were to fall under Russian control, it would significantly bolster Russia’s military-industrial base. Ukraine has emerged as a leader in first-person view (FPV) drone technology, using air drones to strike Russian ammunition depots and marine drones to cripple Russia’s Black Sea Fleet. Beyond warfare, Ukraine has a dynamic tech sector, as evidenced by its state-of-the-art digital government platform, Diia, which was recently adopted by digitally savvy Estonia.
Abandoning Ukraine, as the US appears intent on doing, would have far-reaching global consequences. Known as the “breadbasket of Europe,” Ukraine is one of the world’s top agricultural exporters. Subjugating it would give Russia control over 12% of all calories traded worldwide, including one-third of the world’s wheat, half of its sunflower oil, one-quarter of its barley, and one-fifth of its maize. It would also give Putin control over Ukraine’s coal and natural-gas reserves.
Ukraine’s immense industrial and human resources once helped make the Soviet Union a global power. Now, an unfavorable ceasefire deal risks putting the country in Russia’s sphere of influence and enabling Putin to achieve his neo-czarist dream.
With access to Ukraine’s military strength, industrial capacity, and natural, human, and technological resources, Russia could transform itself from a debilitated country with a smaller economy than Texas into a far more dangerous adversary capable of threatening many other countries beyond Ukraine. With the US now increasingly acting in Russia’s interests, supporting Ukraine is not just a moral imperative for Europe. It is an existential one.
To have unlimited access to our content including in-depth commentaries, book reviews, exclusive interviews, PS OnPoint and PS The Big Picture, please subscribe
Ukraine’s immense industrial and human resources once helped make the Soviet Union a global power, and Russian President Vladimir Putin is counting on them to achieve his neo-imperialist dream. With the US now behaving like a Kremlin proxy, supporting Ukraine has become an existential imperative for Europe.
warn that abandoning the country could hand Vladimir Putin the opportunity to restore Russia’s imperial status.
Donald Trump and J.D. Vance’s verbal assault on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office was shocking but not surprising. As the Trump administration rapidly destroys America's credibility and international standing, Europe must mobilize its ample resources to replace America as a global leader.
says the Trump administration's Oval Office fight with Ukraine's president is a moment that will live in infamy.
BERKELEY – Until the Oval Office meeting between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky went off the rails, it appeared that Zelensky was there to sign a deal requiring Ukraine to contribute 50% of future profits from its commodity mining to a fund jointly managed by the United States. Instead, Zelensky’s repeated requests for at least some security guarantees culminated in a verbal assault from Trump and US Vice President J.D. Vance, and Zelensky left empty-handed.
What Ukraine was supposed to gain from the deal was never entirely clear. But whatever the details, Ukraine’s value cannot be reduced to a mineral transaction. The country’s fate could reshape the geopolitical order, potentially shifting the balance of power, in Europe and beyond, for decades to come.
Despite Trump and Vance’s narrow characterization, Ukraine is far more than a small, mineral-rich country fighting off a much larger aggressor. Ukraine was a pillar of Soviet military power during World War II and the Cold War, and it remains a major source of agricultural commodities, skilled labor, and technological innovation.
Russian President Vladimir Putin understands Ukraine’s strategic value, seeing it as critical to his neo-imperialist project. Before and after World War II, Ukraine was a key hub of the Soviet Union’s military-industrial complex, manufacturing aircraft, ships, and tanks, along with the aluminum and steel needed to build them. The iconic T-34 tank, a mainstay of the Soviet army during World War II, was produced in Kharkiv, while Mykolaiv’s shipyards manufactured the Soviet navy’s most formidable cruisers and submarines.
Ukraine contributed enormously to the war effort. Seven million Ukrainian soldiers – more than one-fifth of the Red Army – fought against Nazi Germany. Many were senior officers, including Marshal Semyon Timoshenko, a key architect of the Soviet victory.
Ukraine’s strategic importance grew during the Cold War. Ukrainian physicists were at the forefront of nuclear science, conducting the Soviet Union’s first successful nuclear-fission experiments, designing viable nuclear explosives, and laying the foundation for the Soviet nuclear-weapons program.
Winter Sale: Save 40% on a new PS subscription
At a time of escalating global turmoil, there is an urgent need for incisive, informed analysis of the issues and questions driving the news – just what PS has always provided.
Subscribe to Digital or Digital Plus now to secure your discount.
Subscribe Now
Beyond research, Ukraine was a major producer of nuclear missiles. It produced some of the Soviet Union’s most powerful intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), including the R-36, dubbed “SS-18 Satan” by NATO. Ukraine remained integral to Russia’s nuclear arsenal well into the 2010s, having manufactured 15% of its heavy silo-based ICBMs.
Moreover, the Soviet Union’s first ICBMs were designed by a Ukrainian engineer, Sergei Korolev, while he was a political prisoner. After his release, he became the USSR’s chief rocket designer, leading the team that launched Sputnik 1, the world’s first satellite, and sent the first probes to the Moon and the first human into space.
Despite Russia’s claim to be the Soviet Union’s sole heir, Ukraine inherited a significant share of the USSR’s military capabilities. When it declared independence in 1991, it had 1.5 million troops and a sizable naval fleet. It also had the world’s third-largest nuclear arsenal, but under international pressure, Ukraine agreed to relinquish its warheads to Russia in exchange for security guarantees from the US, the United Kingdom, and – ironically – Russia itself. Ukraine also agreed to divide the Black Sea Fleet, transferring or selling most of its ships to Russia.
Even after voluntarily giving up much of its military power, Ukraine remains strategically vital, owing to its vast agricultural, natural, and industrial resources. Moreover, its resistance to Russian tyranny has forged the most skilled and battle-tested military force in Europe.
But Russia is determined to undermine Ukraine’s strength by draining its resources, forcibly conscripting tens of thousands of men – particularly ethnic minorities – from the territories it occupies. More than 43,000 people from Crimea and 48,000 from eastern Ukraine have been sent to fight for Russia. Meanwhile, Ukraine’s natural wealth is being plundered, with Russia seizing control of rare-earth deposits concentrated in the regions under its occupation.
If Ukraine were to fall under Russian control, it would significantly bolster Russia’s military-industrial base. Ukraine has emerged as a leader in first-person view (FPV) drone technology, using air drones to strike Russian ammunition depots and marine drones to cripple Russia’s Black Sea Fleet. Beyond warfare, Ukraine has a dynamic tech sector, as evidenced by its state-of-the-art digital government platform, Diia, which was recently adopted by digitally savvy Estonia.
Abandoning Ukraine, as the US appears intent on doing, would have far-reaching global consequences. Known as the “breadbasket of Europe,” Ukraine is one of the world’s top agricultural exporters. Subjugating it would give Russia control over 12% of all calories traded worldwide, including one-third of the world’s wheat, half of its sunflower oil, one-quarter of its barley, and one-fifth of its maize. It would also give Putin control over Ukraine’s coal and natural-gas reserves.
Ukraine’s immense industrial and human resources once helped make the Soviet Union a global power. Now, an unfavorable ceasefire deal risks putting the country in Russia’s sphere of influence and enabling Putin to achieve his neo-czarist dream.
With access to Ukraine’s military strength, industrial capacity, and natural, human, and technological resources, Russia could transform itself from a debilitated country with a smaller economy than Texas into a far more dangerous adversary capable of threatening many other countries beyond Ukraine. With the US now increasingly acting in Russia’s interests, supporting Ukraine is not just a moral imperative for Europe. It is an existential one.