Forged in the crucible of World War I, modern economic sanctions have long been regarded as tools for preventing shooting wars and deterring international bad actors. But a closer look at the history suggests that such punitive measures amount to war by other means.
LONDON – The point of historical study is to improve our understanding of ourselves and our world. Some histories – especially those concerning remote times or narrow specialist topics – may seem relevant to our current concerns only as food for thought about the human condition. But others, like Cornell University historian Nicholas Mulder’s The Economic Weapon: The Rise of Sanctions as a Tool of Modern War, face the opposite problem: the topic’s relevance risks eclipsing the historical analysis.
LONDON – The point of historical study is to improve our understanding of ourselves and our world. Some histories – especially those concerning remote times or narrow specialist topics – may seem relevant to our current concerns only as food for thought about the human condition. But others, like Cornell University historian Nicholas Mulder’s The Economic Weapon: The Rise of Sanctions as a Tool of Modern War, face the opposite problem: the topic’s relevance risks eclipsing the historical analysis.